PBL Products
BAI personnel have incorporated the concept of "Support System Performance Parameters" (a subset of Key Performance Parameters, or KPPs) into Navy procurements for aircraft, airframe, engine, radar and electronics . In addition to the Reliability, Maintainability, and Supportability (RM&S) parameters upon which all quantitative support system commodity decisions are based, BAI personnel re-introduced the concept of Operational Availability (Ao) as one of the Key Performance Parameters for aircraft, their major subsystems, and systems, directly relating system and subsystem Ao to aircraft mission capability measures of effectiveness, and the assigned CNO goals for each aircraft. Since Ao mathematically combines the RM&S measures of effectiveness (MOE), it continues to serve as one of the Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) for virtually all equipment acquisitions.
These Performance Based Logistics (PBL) and closely related products have included:
- LSAR A Sheet Operational availability thresholds/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for Airframe, Engine, and Avionic systems
- Tailored MIL-STD 1388-1A/2A Logistic Support Analysis (LSA) requirements for Airframe, Engine, and Avionic systems
- Support System Performance Requirements/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the A 6F Aircraft
- Support System Performance Requirements/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the A 6F Radar
- Support System Performance Requirements/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the A 6F Airframe
- Support System Performance Requirements/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the A 6F Engine
- Support System Performance Requirements/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the EA 6B ADVCAP RPG
- Support System Performance Requirements/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the EA 6B Avionic Improvement Program (AIP)
- Support System Performance Requirements/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the AN/ALQ 149
- Support System Performance Requirements/Key Performance Parameters (KPP) for the F-14D Aircraft
- Supportability Assessment Plan for EA-6B ICAP III
- Supportability Assessment Report for EA-6B ICAP III
- Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) Evaluation Plan for EA-6B Avionics Improvement Program (AIP)
- Development of a Reliability, Maintainability, Availability and Supportability (RMAS) Key Performance Parameter (KPP)-based roadmap to increase the EA-6B aircraft Mission Capability to the CNO Goal
- Revision of the Mission Essential Subsystems Matrices (MESMs) for EA-6B, EA-6A, A-6E, and KA-6D aircraft to increase Key Performance Parameter (KPP) reporting accuracy
- Readiness Improvement Status Evaluation Summary (RISE) reports for NAVAIR's EA-6B/A-6E/KA-6D aircraft to identify and resolve Key Performance Parameter (KPP) issues impacting achievement of the CNO Mission Capability Goals
- Revisions to OPNAVINST 5442.4H, based on a review of the A-6 aircraft family Mission Essential Subsystems Matrices (MESMs), for OP-506, PMA-234, and AIR-410/3.1, to enable increased Key Performance Parameter (KPP) reporting accuracy
- Development of an ECP Candidate List for A-6E aircraft based on the Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) of Operational Availability (Ao), Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability (RMAS) and budget constraints
- Development of a roadmap for aircraft ECP Candidate Selection based on the Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) of Operational Availability (Ao), Reliability and Maintainability (R&M), and Life Cycle Cost constraints
- Development of a roadmap for EC-130 aircraft Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Candidate Selection based on the Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) of Operational Availability (Ao), Reliability and Maintainability (R&M), and Life Cycle Cost, with the options of: a) meeting the assigned platform Mission Capability Goals; b) maximizing platform Mission Capability while expending a limited available budget amount; or, c) maximizing platform Mission Capability while minimizing cost
- Development of a roadmap for F-16 aircraft Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Candidate Selection based on Key Performance Parameters (KPP) of Operational Availability (Ao), Reliability and Maintainability (R&M), and Life Cycle Cost, with the options of: a) meeting the assigned platform Mission Capability Goals; b) maximizing platform Mission Capability while expending a limited available budget amount; or, c) maximizing platform Mission Capability while minimizing cost
______________________________________________________
|
